首页> 外文OA文献 >The challenge to health professionals when carers resist truth telling at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis
【2h】

The challenge to health professionals when carers resist truth telling at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis

机译:当护理人员在生命的最后阶段拒绝说真话时,对卫生专业人员的挑战:定性的二级分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims and objectives: To draw out the similar complexities faced by staff aroundtruth-telling in a children’s and adult population and to interrogate the dilemmas faced by staff when informal carers act to block truth-telling.Background: Policy encourages normalisation of death, but carers may act to protect or prevent the patient from being told the truth. Little is known about the impact on staff.Design: Secondary analysis of data using a supra-analysis design to identify commonality of experiences.Methods: Secondary ‘supra-analysis’ was used to transcend the focus of two primary studies in the UK, which examined staff perspectives in a palliative children’s and a palliative adult setting, respectively. The analysis examined new theoretical questions relating to the commonality of issues independently derived in each primary study. Both primary studies used focus groups. Existing empirical data were analysed thematically and compared across the studies.Results: Staff reported a hiding of the truth by carers and sustained use of activities aimed at prolonging life. Carers frequently ignored the advance of end of life, and divergence between staff and carer approaches to truth-telling challenged professionals. Not being truthful with patients had a deleterious effect on staff, causing anger and feelings of incompetence.Conclusions: Both children’s and adult specialist palliative care staff found themselves caught in a dilemma, subject to policies that promoted openness in planning for death and informal carers who often prevented them from being truthful with patients about terminal prognosis. This dilemma had adverse psychological effects upon many staff.Relevance to clinical practice: There remains a powerful death-denying culture inmany societies, and carers of dying patients may prevent staff from being truthful with their patients. The current situation is not ideal, and open discussion of this problem is the essential first step in finding a solution.
机译:目的和目标:找出在儿童和成人中讲真话的工作人员面临的类似复杂性,并询问非正式护工采取行动阻止真相时工作人员面临的困境。背景:政策鼓励使死亡正常化,但护工可能采取行动保护或防止患者被告知真相。对员工的影响知之甚少。设计:使用超分析设计对数据进行二次分析以识别经验的共通性。方法:二次“超分析”用于超越英国两项主要研究的重点在姑息性儿童和姑息性成人环境中分别研究了工作人员的观点。分析检查了与每个初级研究中独立得出的问题的共性有关的新理论问题。两项主要研究均使用焦点小组。对现有的经验数据进行了主题分析,并在研究中进行了比较。结果:员工报告说护老者隐藏了真相,并持续使用旨在延长寿命的活动。护老者常常忽视生命的终结,而工作人员和护老者在诉说真相的专业人员方面的分歧。不诚实地对待患者会对员工造成有害影响,引起愤怒和无能的感觉。结论:儿童和成人专科姑息治疗人员都陷入了困境,但必须遵守促进开放性的死亡计划和非正式护理人员政策。通常会阻止他们与患者就末期预后事如实。这种困境对许多员工产生了不利的心理影响。与临床实践的相关性:在许多社会中,仍然存在着强大的否认死亡的文化,而垂死的患者的照顾者可能会阻止员工对患者的诚实。当前的情况并不理想,对此问题进行公开讨论是找到解决方案的重要第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号